Der Zivilprozess des russischen Milliardärs Dmitry Rybolovlev gegen den Schweizer Kunsthändler Yves Bouvier und das Auktionshaus Sotheby’s geht weiter. Rybolovlevs Anwalt, Marcus Asner, führte aggressive Befragungen durch. Bouvier, der wiederholt jegliches Fehlverhalten bestritten hat, wurde beschuldigt, Rybolovlev zwischen 2010 und 2014 mit Hilfe von Sotheby’s um eine Milliarde Dollar überhöht zu haben. Als Beweis wurden unter anderem E-Mails vorgelegt, in denen Bouvier den Preis für ein Gemälde auf 43,5 Millionen Dollar verhandelte, angeblich nachdem der ursprüngliche Preis bei 60 Millionen Dollar gelegen hatte. Es stellte sich jedoch heraus, dass der Verkäufer tatsächlich 25 Millionen Dollar verlangt hatte. Das Gericht erfuhr auch, dass Bouvier Interesse daran gezeigt hatte, ein Modigliani-Gemälde vom Hedgefonds-Manager Steve Cohen zu kaufen, das dann jedoch schnell für zusätzliche 18 Millionen Dollar an Rybolovlev weiterverkauft wurde. Es wurde hervorgehoben, dass Sotheby’s in keiner der Transaktionen direkt mit Rybolovlev oder seinem Geschäftsmanager korrespondierte, was auf keine direkte Verbindung zwischen dem Auktionshaus und dem Milliardär hindeutet. Bouviers Vertreter beteuern seine Unschuld und verweisen auf frühere Gerichtsurteile und Medienberichte.

Community Reaction

The civil suit between Dmitry Rybolovlev, Yves Bouvier, and Sotheby’s has garnered significant attention from the art world and the general public. Many people are fascinated by the allegations of overcharging and the astronomical sums of money involved.

Some members of the community have expressed shock and disbelief at the extent of the alleged scheme. They find it hard to comprehend how someone could inflate prices to such an extent and make massive profits at the expense of others. Others are intrigued by the intricate details of the art market and the ways in which prices can be manipulated.

There are also those who question the motives of Dmitry Rybolovlev. Some speculate that his motivation for pursuing the civil suit is not only to seek justice but also to regain his reputation and potentially recoup some of his losses. They argue that as a billionaire, he should have been more savvy and cautious when making art investments.

In contrast, supporters of Yves Bouvier argue that he is being unfairly targeted and that his reputation is being tarnished by false allegations. They point to his successful track record as an art dealer and his previous court victories as evidence of his credibility.

Official Responses

So far, both Sotheby’s and Yves Bouvier have issued official statements denying any wrongdoing. They emphasize their commitment to transparency and fair business practices.

Sotheby’s has stated that they will fully cooperate with the legal process and provide any necessary information to the court. They maintain that they have always acted in accordance with their professional obligations and have not engaged in any fraudulent activities.

Yves Bouvier, through his representatives, maintains his innocence and argues that all transactions were conducted legitimately. They stress that Bouvier acted as a dealer, facilitating the purchase and sale of artworks, and that any differences in pricing were a result of negotiation between the parties involved.

Outlook and Expectations

As the civil suit progresses, the art world is eager to see the outcome and the impact it may have on the industry. If the allegations against Yves Bouvier and Sotheby’s are proven true, it could lead to significant changes in how art transactions are conducted and regulated.

Additionally, the outcome of the civil suit may have repercussions for the reputations of both Yves Bouvier and Dmitry Rybolovlev. If Bouvier is found guilty, his career as an art dealer may be irreparably damaged. Conversely, if Rybolovlev is unsuccessful in his pursuit of justice, it may further tarnish his reputation and raise questions about his business acumen.

Ultimately, the civil suit between Dmitry Rybolovlev, Yves Bouvier, and Sotheby’s is a complex legal battle with far-reaching implications. It highlights the intersection of art, wealth, and legal intricacies. The outcome will not only determine the resolution of this particular case but may also shape the future of the art market as a whole.

Source link

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert

You May Also Like